After Bitcoin’s sharp drawdown, concerns resurfaced that Strategy could become a forced seller. Michael Saylor shut it down, again and stated Bitcoin would need to collapse below extreme levels and stay there for years before Strategy faces real pressure. Translation: they’re not folding. They’re buying.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doubled down on pushing crypto market structure legislation across the finish line this year. He framed regulatory clarity as essential. The message from Washington is shifting from “if” to “how fast.”

Bill Miller IV suggested there’s a reasonable chance we saw the bottom around $60K.

Was that the last time we see $60K? History says panic prints bottoms fast.

Bitcoin briefly tapped $60,000 and within hours, mainstream financial media lit up. On CNBC, Jim Cramer floated the idea that the U.S. government may have stepped in around those levels. There’s no confirmation, but the mere suggestion tells you how far the narrative has shifted. We’ve gone from “Bitcoin is a scam” to “Did Washington just front-run the bottom?”

If sovereign accumulation is even being discussed on live television, the Overton window has moved.

Pam Bondi made headlines for praising transparency moves while critics argue larger scandals are being sidelined in favor of stock market optics. Politics and markets are colliding in real time, and Bitcoin sits in the middle of it.

The Fed and Treasury are backing themselves into a corner and the only escape is printing. Yield curve control, inflation, and a $30 trillion problem are colliding with Bitcoin at the worst possible time for the dollar. History already showed us how this ends. Scarce assets win and Bitcoin leads the charge.